On Thursday, Bayer closed its $62.5 billion purchase of Monsanto. This comes roughly a week after the Department of Justice (DOJ) approved the merger, on the condition that the corporations sell off $9 billion worth of assets, including seed divisions, intellectual property, research projects, and more. Yet even after these divestitures, the combined entity will be the largest global seed and agrochemical corporation, and U.S. based field crop growers fear the power of the new combine.
Read MoreIn the Take Care blog, Lina Khan explains why the SCOTUS decision on AmEx shows stunning disregard for traditional antitrust principles.
Read MoreIn an article for Vice, Open Markets Food & Power reporter Claire Kelloway explains why from hot dogs to beer to chips and even charcoal, you don’t have much of a choice in whom you pay to celebrate. Even though the average grocery store carries tens of thousands of products, Americans' Independence Day shopping dollars overwhelmingly go to a tiny number of enormous companies.
Read MoreLina Khan explains how the decision in favor of American Express will make it easier for big tech companies to pressure workers, suppliers, and customers.
Read MoreMatt Stoller's tweet called out AT&T for raising prices.
Read MoreIn the Georgetown Law Technology Review, Lina Khan writes about the growing share of our commerce and communications that tech platforms possess.
Read MoreSandeep explains how antitrust laws are being used an anti-worker tool.
Read MoreThe Economist notes Barry Lynn and Matt Stoller's role in the debate on how to address tech monopolies, and endorses the idea that Facebook should be separate from WhatsApp and Instagram, a measure that the Open Markets Institute was first to call for.
Read MoreIn this issue of The Corner, we look at U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's extreme pro-corporate record in antitrust cases. We report on the troubling implications of Match Group's roll-up of dating apps and question its intentions. And we interview Stacy Mitchell on Amazon's effort to grab power over your local government's procurement business.
Read MoreLina Khan's March op-ed is cited in this article explaining the consequences of the Supreme Court ruling.
Read MoreMatt explains the danger the individual citizen faces by endorsing the business model of total surveillance and discrimination and the recent AT&T Supreme Court decision.
Read MoreIn the Financial Times, Barry Lynn writes that this decision will make it harder to bring even basic antitrust complaints.
Read MoreLina Khan explains the negative effect the Supreme Court decision has on the effectiveness of antitrust scrutiny of dominant tech platforms.
Read MoreLina Khan's article in the Yale Law Journal is cited as a resource to explain Amazon's market power.
Read MoreIn response to the Supreme Court's decision in Ohio v. American Express, the Open Markets Institute released the following statement.
Read MoreIn The Des Moines Register, Open Markets' fellow Austin Frerick writes about the Iowa Farm Bureau's power over agricultural policy and how its private revenue sources have given it significant clout both in Iowa and in the national agricultural space. It continues to push for cultivation of only a few crops without any consideration of the consequences of this model on rural Americans. Monopolies, however, thrive under this system.
Read More"We are not consumers, as they define us. We are not mere seekers of stuff, as they define us. We are not even merely workers, fighting merely for workers rights, as they define us. We are Citizens, and we seek nothing more, nor less, than a Citizen’s Liberty. Liberty to think freely. To share equally in all rule. To own our own selves absolutely."
Read More