Posts tagged Sandeep Vaheesan
In The New York Review of Books: Expanding Public Ownership in the Power Sector

In an essay published in The New York Review of Books, Sandeep Vaheesan makes a case for expanding public ownership in the U.S. electric power sector—arguing that an expansion of democratically controlled public power is the best way to secure affordable energy and decarbonization. 

Read More
Amicus Brief Urges Third Circuit to Correct Misinterpretation of Clayton Act Provision on Exclusive Dealing 

The Open Markets Institute filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs in Reading Hospital v. Hill-Rom Holdings, a case concerning the monopolistic manufacturer of hospital beds using exclusive dealing with health systems to perpetuate its dominance.

Read More
Democracy Journal - Rethinking State Capacity

In this co-written essay, legal director Sandeep Vaheesan and chief economist Brian Callaci deliver the argument that today’s “state capacity” discourse wrongly blames democratic procedures for government failure, when the real solution is not deregulated, top-down speed but renewed democratic governance that balances effective state action with public participation and legitimacy.

Read More
Report - Utilities Are Blocking Virtual Power Plants, Driving Up Costs and Undermining Grid Reliability

The Open Markets Institute and Mission:data Coalition published a joint report, “Fair and Open Markets for Virtual Power Plants," on how investor-owned utilities are stifling the growth of virtual power plants (VPPs) and denying customers more affordable and reliable electricity.

Read More
Amicus Brief Urges Ohio Court of Appeals to Uphold State’s Authority to Designate Google as a Common Carrier

The Open Markets Institute filed an amicus brief in State of Ohio v. Google, urging the Fifth District Court of Appeals of Ohio to recognize the state’s authority to designate Google Search as a common carrier—just as courts and legislatures have long done for railroads, telegraphs, telephones, and other corporations that hold themselves out to serve the public. 

Read More
Report - End Point or Setback? A Retrospective of the Maine Public Power Ballot Initiative

Legal director Sandeep Vaheesan co-authors a report examining why Maine's "Pine Tree Power" initiative failed despite broad support for public ownership, offering strategic lessons on how advocates can overcome corporate spending and messaging to win future public power campaigns.

Read More
The Open Markets Institute Applauds Worker Ric Davidson and Legal Team for Stepping Up to Defend the Federal Non-Compete Ban

The Open Markets Institute commended Texas-based worker Ric Davidson, his counsel at Gustafson Gluek, Burns Charest, and Towards Justice for stepping in to defend the Federal Trade Commission’s landmark ban on non-compete clauses—an essential policy to protect workers’ freedom to change jobs and start new businesses. 

Read More
Project Syndicate - The Trump Administration’s Latest Assault on Workers

Legal director Sandeep Vaheesan co-authors a piece with Alvero Bedoya, former commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission, and current Senior Adviser at the American Economic Liberties Project, arguing that the Trump administration’s suspension of the FTC’s non-compete ban represents a major setback for American workers, reversing one of the most significant pro-labor reforms in decades and reinforcing corporate control over the labor market.

Read More
Open Markets Institute Calls on the Supreme Court to Take Case Challenging Merck’s Deceptive Practices to Preserve Mumps Vaccine Monopoly

The Open Markets Institute filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court, urging the Court to address Merck’s alleged misrepresentations to the Food and Drug Administration to extend its monopoly in the mumps vaccine market.

Read More
Open Markets Institute Files Amicus Brief in Ninth Circuit Challenging Monopoly in Surgical Robot Market 

The Open Markets Institute filed an amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals warning that Intuitive Surgical is exploiting its monopoly over surgical robots to dominate markets for essential accessories—posing serious risks to hospitals, doctors, and patients. 

Read More